@kuba same as fakebook with 1 pixel beacon. the power of big data and good algorithm. So they have hits from time to time from person X on different sites because of that pixel or fonts, but somewhere on server now records exist. At some point person will open site where they are logged in, so now ALL these records have name on it. I'll admit, just recording an IP with request for font/beacon is not so powerful as tracking, but this is not only thing to fingerprint someone. @meena @jayrope
@meena @kuba @jayrope They discovered these simple tricks in the mid 2000s, and it's largely how Google got to be what it is now. Data mining the logs.
For a long time naive techies also gave them cover, with the mantra of "I trust Google with X". Sponsorship has also helped to ensure that nobody gives a tech talk about this. But I notice that the EU is now starting to get interested in self-hosted fonts, and so the classic grift might not be able to continue much longer.
Don't get me wrong, I hate Google with a passion and always self-host my fonts. I've tried reporting sites for using Google Fonts and it rarely worked, I just want to know what exact angle can be used for it to trigger a fine
@kuba oh I see your point now. but google already knows that site Y used their "free" fonts. They want information that some particular person has visited this site, and if you open site in one tab and google search/email/other in another tab, that gives them 99,9% assurance that that person was you, now they can add more info about you into huge database, to sort you into categories and then sell data to literally anyone interested. @fabiscafe @meena @jayrope
A place for trans makers, coders, tinkerers and dreamers.