So it’s a piece of shit gas oven that was recalled a decade ago, all landlords are bastards, etc etc.
If you try and use it normally, the thermostat just stops the gas flow after a few minutes regardless of temperature. Useless.
After some time fighting this frustration I made a wire contraption (to replace prior rubber-band attempts) to hold down the thermostat knob, such that the gas flow is forced on, but it still adjusts the temperature. The only side effect is that the lighter clicks constantly whenever the door is opened.
So the other night I put some food in there to reheat, set up the contraption to keep it on, opened the door and waited for the “whoof” noise of the gas lighting. Then I left to the other room.
Five minutes later my housemate went into the kitchen. They noticed it smelled like gas, and went to open the oven door to check it was working.
You may be able to predict what resulted.
mild injury, safety analysis
This event shows amongst other things, the importance of integration testing and holistic approach to designing in safety to dangerous systems.
The wire contraption didn’t on its own appear to create any new risk — the possibility of the oven leaking gas by extinguishing its own flame already existed, and in fact the contraption seemed to *lessen* the risk by keeping the flow high enough to maintain flames.
However, the accident shows that an apparently irrelevant side effect, the continuous activation of the piezo lighter whenever the door is open, became a danger when considered in combination with 1. A failure in another part of the system (the flame going out), and 2. A human interacting with the system in a way that was natural but not, perhaps, ‘correct’. Arguments about what ‘should’ have been done (such as shutting off the gas cock or leaving the room and opening windows) aren’t as important as considering what systematic failures allowed the human to make a bad decision.
A place for trans makers, coders, tinkerers and dreamers.